<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How I use Photo Mechanic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.camerondavidson.com/blog/2009/12/21/how-i-use-photo-mechanic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.camerondavidson.com/blog/2009/12/21/how-i-use-photo-mechanic/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:57:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron Davidson</title>
		<link>http://www.camerondavidson.com/blog/2009/12/21/how-i-use-photo-mechanic/comment-page-1/#comment-480</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 21:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camerondavidson.com/blog/?p=1728#comment-480</guid>
		<description>Matthew

Capture One is my primary Raw Converter along with occasionally using Raw Developer.  I like the workflow from Aperture and hope the next edition will produce cleaner files.  I could easily see converting over to Aperture or LR for everything if the quality is there.  

Occasionally, I use Nikon NX2 for conversions.  It seems to pull every bit of detail out of the NEF files.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthew</p>
<p>Capture One is my primary Raw Converter along with occasionally using Raw Developer.  I like the workflow from Aperture and hope the next edition will produce cleaner files.  I could easily see converting over to Aperture or LR for everything if the quality is there.  </p>
<p>Occasionally, I use Nikon NX2 for conversions.  It seems to pull every bit of detail out of the NEF files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Furman</title>
		<link>http://www.camerondavidson.com/blog/2009/12/21/how-i-use-photo-mechanic/comment-page-1/#comment-477</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Furman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 15:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camerondavidson.com/blog/?p=1728#comment-477</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info Cameron. I&#039;ve never used PM, but will definitely give it a try. I&#039;d also be interested to know which program you&#039;re using to process your files.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info Cameron. I&#8217;ve never used PM, but will definitely give it a try. I&#8217;d also be interested to know which program you&#8217;re using to process your files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Sachs</title>
		<link>http://www.camerondavidson.com/blog/2009/12/21/how-i-use-photo-mechanic/comment-page-1/#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator>David Sachs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camerondavidson.com/blog/?p=1728#comment-455</guid>
		<description>You originally turned me on to Photo Mechanic back in 2006, and I must admit that now it has become an invaluable tool in my belt, and part of my daily workflow.  A++ would recommend again to any photographer serious about keeping their assets in order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You originally turned me on to Photo Mechanic back in 2006, and I must admit that now it has become an invaluable tool in my belt, and part of my daily workflow.  A++ would recommend again to any photographer serious about keeping their assets in order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

